• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • School of Medicine
    • Journal Papers in Scopus 2
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • School of Medicine
    • Journal Papers in Scopus 2
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of automated auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emission in universal neonatal hearing screening

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2017-04-01
    Author
    Saeed Heidari
    Alireza Olyaee Manesh
    Fatemeh Rajabi
    Mohammad Moradi-Joo
    Mohammad Moradi-Joo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    © 2016, Growth & Development Research Center. Background: During the last decade, the rapid expansion of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) has brought into focus questions about the most appropriate screening technology for this indication. Objectives: The main aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in universal neonatal hearing screening programs. Methods: This economic study was performed in Iran. A decision tree model was applied for economic evaluation of the AABR and OAE devices used in UNHS. The main inputs of our model included the prevalence of hearing loss in Iran, device sensitivity, specificity and cost per case, as well as definite diagnosis of each newborn. Upon collection, these inputs were analyzed with TreeAge economic analysis software. Sensitivity analysis was conducted upon examining the probability of uncertainty concerning the inputs. Results: For a one-year period and a one-million population of newborns, the UNHS entails a cost of $3,310,700 and detects 4,650 newborns with hearing loss, using the AABR device. However, if the OAE device is used, the cost will be expanded to $3,414,100 and 3,850 newborns with hearing loss will be detected. Consequently, the AABR device costs $103,400 less than the OAE device, and detects800morecases than the OAE device. Sensitivity analysis results revealed that the prevalence rate or costs of the gold standard had no effect on displacing the dominant technology. Conclusions: In this study, it was found that the AABR is the cost-effective alternative compared to OAE. AABR dominates OAE, because it has lower expected costs and higher effectiveness.
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijp.5229
    Collections
    • Journal Papers in Scopus 2

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Contact Us | Send Feedback