Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHajar Moradmand
dc.contributor.authorSaeed Setayeshi
dc.contributor.authorAli Reza Karimian
dc.contributor.authorMehri Sirous
dc.contributor.authorMohammad Esmaeil Akbari
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T10:01:42Z
dc.date.available2017-09-18T10:01:42Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://dsp.sbmu.ac.ir/xmlui/handle/123456789/61363
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In order to improve diagnosis of cancer correctly, image enhancement technology is often used to enhance the image and help radiologists. Methods: This paper presents a comparative study in digital mammography image enhancement based on four different algorithms: wavelet-based enhancement (Asymmetric Daubechies of order 8), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), morphological operators and unsharp masking. These algorithms have been tested on 114 clinical digital mammography images. The comparison for all the proposed image enhancement techniques was carried out to find out the best technique in enhancement of the mammogram images to detect microcalcifications. Results: For evaluation of performance of image enhancement algorithms, the Contrast Improvement Index (CII) and profile intensity surface area distribution curve quality assessment have been used after any enhancement. The results of this study have shown that the average of CII is about 2.61 for wavelet and for CLAHE, unsharp masking and morphology operation are about 2.047, 1.63 and 1.315 respectively. Conclusion: Experimental results strongly suggest that the wavelet transformation can be more effective and improve significantly overall detection of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system especially for dense breast. Compare to other studies, our method achieved a higher CII.
dc.sourceIranian Journal of Cancer Prevention
dc.subjectBreast neoplasm
dc.subjectImage enhancement
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectWavelet transform
dc.titleComparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography
dc.journal.volume5
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.pages61-68
dc.contributor.authorid55005319300
dc.contributor.authorid56962768400
dc.contributor.authorid55386610800
dc.contributor.authorid24175397500
dc.contributor.authorid56666938200
dc.contributor.citation55005319300|60007751|Hajar Moradmand
dc.contributor.citation56962768400|60007751|Saeed Setayeshi
dc.contributor.citation55386610800|60024836|Ali Reza Karimian
dc.contributor.citation24175397500|60020609|Mehri Sirous
dc.contributor.citation56666938200|60018934|Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari
dc.contributor.affiliationid60007751
dc.contributor.affiliationid60007751
dc.contributor.affiliationid60024836
dc.contributor.affiliationid60020609
dc.contributor.affiliationid60018934


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record